From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Owen Jacobson" <ojacobson(at)osl(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: How to force PostgreSQL using an index |
Date: | 2006-02-15 23:02:47 |
Message-ID: | 20580.1140044567@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
"Owen Jacobson" <ojacobson(at)osl(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 04:58:54PM -0500, Daniel Caune wrote:
>> I see, but that doesn't explain whether it is possible to specify the
>> index to use. It seems that those options just force PostgreSQL using
>> another plan.
> Drop the simple index and re-create it when you're done?
BTW, the cute way to do that is
BEGIN;
DROP INDEX unwanted;
EXPLAIN ANALYZE whatever...;
ROLLBACK;
No need to actually rebuild the index when you are done.
This does hold an exclusive lock on the table for the duration of your
experiment, so maybe not such a good idea in a live environment ... but
then again, dropping useful indexes in a live environment isn't a good
idea either, and this at least reduces the duration of the experiment by
a good deal.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Daniel Caune | 2006-02-15 23:22:20 | Re: How to force PostgreSQL using an index |
Previous Message | Daniel Caune | 2006-02-15 22:48:06 | Re: How to force PostgreSQL using an index |