Re: Understanding partial index selection

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Owen Nelson <onelson(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Understanding partial index selection
Date: 2023-11-29 01:44:28
Message-ID: 205440.1701222268@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Owen Nelson <onelson(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Are your ANALYZE stats up to date on this table?

> It's a very good question! Right now, I'm taking it on faith that
> autovacuum and autoanalyze are keeping things up to date, but if I'm honest
> I've been getting some conflicting information from pg_stat_user_tables and
> I'm starting to suspect this might be an AWS Aurora quirk.

Oh, you didn't say this was Aurora. Aurora is not really Postgres ---
at least, my not-an-insider impression is that the storage engine
is quite different. Not sure how much of the advice you got here
is relevant to it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Owen Nelson 2023-11-29 02:13:43 Re: Understanding partial index selection
Previous Message Owen Nelson 2023-11-29 01:12:51 Re: Understanding partial index selection