Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Tony Caduto" <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com>, "Devrim GUNDUZ" <devrim(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary
Date: 2006-03-22 22:32:31
Message-ID: 20532.1143066751@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
>> There's also a licensing issue which is that pgAdmin is GPL, while
>> we're trying to make sure that all contrib modules are licensed
>> the same as the core server.

> Yeuch, not GPL - Artistic.

Oh, my mistake, I looked at the phppgadmin home page not pgadmin's.
But relicensing the proposed contrib code to BSD would definitely make
it an easier sale.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jimbo1 2006-03-22 22:34:09 Re: Advantages of PostgreSQL over MySQL 5.0
Previous Message Dave Page 2006-03-22 22:20:27 Re: question about the admin contrib module and binary