Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect range in pg_regress comment

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect range in pg_regress comment
Date: 2025-02-02 21:26:38
Message-ID: 205156.1738531598@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com> writes:
> I noticed that a comment in pg_regress incorrectly states that
> alternative output files can be named filename{_i}.out with 0 < i <= 9.
> However, the actual valid range is 0 <= i <= 9. This patch corrects the
> comment.

Hmm, our convention is definitely that the numbers start with 1,
so I do not want to make this change. Maybe we should change
the code instead.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jelte Fennema-Nio 2025-02-02 21:46:55 Re: [PATCH] Fix incorrect range in pg_regress comment
Previous Message Alexander Korotkov 2025-02-02 20:43:19 Re: Vacuum statistics