Re: meson vs tarballs

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: meson vs tarballs
Date: 2024-03-13 14:42:04
Message-ID: 2047141.1710340924@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> On 13.03.24 07:42, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>> On 2024-03-13 We 02:31, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>>>> Alternatively, PostgreSQL can be built using Meson. This is currently
>>>> experimental and only works when building from a Git checkout (not
>>>> from a distribution tarball).

>> Ah!. Darn, I missed that. Thanks.
>> Of course, when release 17 comes out this had better not be the case,
>> since we have removed the custom Windows build system.

> Yes, this has been changed in 17.

My understanding is that pretty soon there will be no difference,
ie distribution tarballs will have the same contents as a git pull
(less the .git infrastructure). If we're planning on making that
happen for 17, perhaps we'd better get on with it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2024-03-13 15:14:50 Re: Support a wildcard in backtrace_functions
Previous Message Dean Rasheed 2024-03-13 14:32:11 Re: MERGE ... WHEN NOT MATCHED BY SOURCE