| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Patch Count? |
| Date: | 2005-02-05 05:31:57 |
| Message-ID: | 20436.1107581517@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>> How do you get the count? CVS names at the tail of the commit?
> I don't know; Marc and you did it. I'm looking for the number of *people*,
> not the number of patches. So part of it would come from your mailbox.
Trolling through the pgsql-patches archives might work to count the
number of different people who submitted patches. The number of those
whose work got accepted would be a bit lower of course. If you want the
latter you probably have to troll the CVS logs --- and I'd be a bit
worried that we might have failed to credit some patches properly in the
CVS entries. Are you after an optimistic number or a pessimistic one?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2005-02-05 06:02:55 | Re: Patch Count? |
| Previous Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-02-05 04:43:56 | Re: Patch Count? |