Re: problems with building recent cvs snaphots

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
Cc: depesz(at)depesz(dot)pl, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: problems with building recent cvs snaphots
Date: 2002-11-02 14:48:16
Message-ID: 20421.1036248496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> writes:
> Hubert depesz Lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)pl> writes:
>> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 07:28:16PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Or use a tarball distribution (beta3 or the nightly snapshot).
>>
>> and precompiled binaries are not really an option.

> Tom means a tarball source distribution. You don't have to run Bison
> when building from a tarball (the Bison-generated files are already
> included); you do when building from CVS. Clear?

Also, if you're willing to build Postgres from source, I fail to see why
you're resisting building bison from source. It's not hard:

tar xfz bison-1.75.tar.gz
cd bison-1.75
make
make check -- optional
make install -- probably need to do this step as root

and then make sure /usr/local/bin is in your PATH ahead of whereever
the standard bison lives. When your distro updates, clean out
/usr/local and you're back to normal.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-02 14:51:02 Re: problems with building recent cvs snaphots
Previous Message Tino Wildenhain 2002-11-02 14:46:05 Re: unique in two not so unique columns