| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
| Date: | 2010-01-11 15:44:52 |
| Message-ID: | 2041.1263224692@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> pg_dump sorts its output first by object type, then by object name, and
> then processes all that for dependencies. This works well, but for
> overloaded functions this still gives a random sort order that can
> produce annoying diffs in the dump.
> Would it be acceptable to introduce a secondary sort key field into the
> DumpableObject struct that functions would fill with, say, the argument
> types (maybe something like "text,int,int" -- need to play with this a
> little)?
I think you could probably use the existing tag field; no need for a new
one. The real problem is that an object-type-specific sort rule is a
bit klugy. IIRC there is discussion of this in the archives already ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-01-11 16:57:49 | Re: pg_dump sort order for functions |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-11 15:32:32 | Re: pg.dropped |