Re: DSM robustness failure (was Re: Peripatus/failures)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>
Cc: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: DSM robustness failure (was Re: Peripatus/failures)
Date: 2018-10-18 00:10:28
Message-ID: 20407.1539821428@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org> writes:
> On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 07:07:09PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... Was your Python install built
>> with any special switches? I just used what came from "pkg install".

> It had been built on a previous FreeBSD build, I have my own poudriere
> infrastructure. I can probably get you the package from my ZFS snaps if
> you'd like.

I've now verified that the bog-standard packages for python 2.7 and python
3.6 both build and pass regression cleanly, using ALPHA10. And I see
peripatus is back to green too. So as far as the plpython end of this is
concerned, I think we can write it off as "something wrong with Larry's
custom package build". However, I'm still slightly interested in how it
was that that broke DSM so thoroughly ... I pulled down your version of
python2.7 and will see if that reproduces it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Larry Rosenman 2018-10-18 00:14:29 Re: DSM robustness failure (was Re: Peripatus/failures)
Previous Message Tsunakawa, Takayuki 2018-10-18 00:06:47 RE: Implementation of Flashback Query