| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: So what about XSLT? |
| Date: | 2008-08-15 14:05:24 |
| Message-ID: | 20407.1218809124@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> An open task in replacing contrib/xml2 is the XSLT support, which the current
> core implementation lacks altogether. I am known to often be in favor of a
> lean core, so I have so far been hesitant to push this further, but we should
> eventually come up with an implementation for the users' sake.
> So where should XSLT functionality live:
That question is unanswerable except in the context of a specific
proposal for the amount of functionality and code involved. To take
it to extremes: if you are talking about adding 100 lines, no one will
object to putting it in core; if you are talking about adding 100000
lines, some of us will object. I suppose you are thinking of something
in between, but what?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-15 14:14:51 | Re: migrate data 6.5.3 -> 8.3.1 |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-08-15 14:01:36 | Re: proposal sql: labeled function params |