Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released

From: "Brian Maguire" <bmaguire(at)vantage(dot)com>
To: "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Date: 2003-11-18 02:27:13
Message-ID: 203C7FC3FF2D7A4588CE0429A87F3C9A0AC3B5@vt-pe2550-001.vantage.vantage.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

And all along I thought "v" stood for "victory" we launched 7.4! Seriously huge effort, great product, cheers! Another great milestone.

Cheers to the veam, I mean team.



-----Original Message-----
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net]
Sent: Mon 11/17/2003 9:10 PM
To: Joshua D. Drake
Cc: Marc G. Fournier; pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL v7.4 Released

Joshua D. Drake writes:

> Somebody please explain to me what the hell a difference it makes if
> we have a v in front of the version number?

Packaging tools, packaging standards, convention, consistency of public
presentation.

--
Peter Eisentraut peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 9: the planner will ignore your desire to choose an index scan if your
joining column's datatypes do not match

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oliver Elphick 2003-11-18 02:27:21 Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2003-11-18 02:25:50 Re: PostgreSQL v7.4 Released