Re: GSoC 2017

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alexander Korotkov <a(dot)korotkov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ruben Buchatskiy <ruben(at)ispras(dot)ru>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: GSoC 2017
Date: 2017-03-04 16:06:26
Message-ID: 20381.1488643586@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 2/27/17 4:52 PM, Thomas Munro wrote:
>>> By the way, that page claims that PostgreSQL runs on Irix and Tru64,
>>> which hasn't been true for a few years.

>> There could be a GSoC project to add support for those back in... ;P

> ... Whether it's also
> useful to try to support running the system on unobtainable operating
> systems is less clear to me.

I seriously doubt that we'd take patches to run on non-mainstream OSes
without a concomitant promise to support buildfarm animals running such
OSes for the foreseeable future. Without that we don't know if the
patches still work even a week after they're committed. We killed the
above-mentioned OSes mainly for lack of any such animals, IIRC.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Sharma 2017-03-04 16:22:57 Parallel seq. plan is not coming against inheritance or partition table
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-03-04 16:02:14 Re: [PATCH] Use $ parameters as replacement characters for pg_stat_statements