| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Lamar Owen <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, Alfred Perlstein <bright(at)wintelcom(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
| Date: | 2000-12-30 01:48:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20354.978140916@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> If libedit could be used as an alternative to readline depending on your
> operating system setup then there's nothing wrong with that.
I have no objection to being able to work with either one, if someone's
excited about making that happen. I'd still think it a waste of effort,
but as long as it's not my effort I can hardly complain...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Alan Dorman | 2000-12-30 01:51:03 | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-30 01:46:40 | Re: GNU readline and BSD license |