Re: verbose cost estimate

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: verbose cost estimate
Date: 2019-12-09 22:40:40
Message-ID: 20338.1575931240@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> ... Perhaps a path-specific struct, referenced
> from the path and built only with verbose explain would be fine?

How would that work, given that the planner doesn't know whether its
output is going to get explained? With features like the plan cache
and auto_explain in mind, it's very hard to see how you avoid having
to save the information always.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karl O. Pinc 2019-12-09 23:03:43 Re: proposal: minscale, rtrim, btrim functions for numeric
Previous Message Tom Lane 2019-12-09 22:32:48 Re: remove support for old Python versions