Re: 7.5 Plans

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Rod Taylor <pg(at)rbt(dot)ca>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 7.5 Plans
Date: 2003-11-27 05:23:40
Message-ID: 20336.1069910620@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
> 'k, but why can't that be accomplished with $Id$?

$Id$ isn't much better than $Header$ --- the point is to avoid keywords
that downstream people's CVS repositories will want to replace.

> Are there any caveats to the change? Ie. if Tom has a checkout and this
> change is made, will he have problems committing?

Making the change will mean a big "cvs update" pass for everyone, but
no worse than what happens every time Bruce hits the copyright dates,
for example. It's a one-line change in every file AFAICS.

I'd recommend giving committers a day or two's notice of the edit, same
as Bruce typically does for pgindent runs, but there's no reason to
consider it any worse than that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Rod Taylor 2003-11-27 05:36:27 Re: 7.5 Plans
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-11-27 05:11:51 Re: 7.5 Plans