From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Marc Fournier <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-www(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Clock skew with PG CVS repository? |
Date: | 2007-07-16 21:17:49 |
Message-ID: | 20331.1184620669@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
I've noted a couple of cases recently that seem to indicate the CVS
machine's clock is a few seconds ahead of mine, eg just now I did
"cvs commit" and then immediately "make", and got this:
$ make
make: *** Warning: File `lock.c' has modification time in the future (2007-07-16 17:09:50 > 2007-07-16 17:09:43)
gcc -O1 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -fno-strict-aliasing -g -I../../../../src/include -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -c -o lock.o lock.c
gcc -O1 -Wall -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Winline -fno-strict-aliasing -g -I../../../../src/include -D_XOPEN_SOURCE_EXTENDED -c -o proc.o proc.c
/usr/ccs/bin/ld -r -o SUBSYS.o lmgr.o lock.o proc.o deadlock.o lwlock.o spin.o s_lock.o
make: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete.
$
Manually issuing "date" on cvs.postgresql.org seems to confirm it's
about ten seconds fast compared to here. Now NTP swears up and down
that I'm synced within a few milliseconds of three different reference
machines, so I think the problem is at that end. Is cvs.postgresql.org
supposed to be running NTP? 'Cause I don't see any such daemon there.
I haven't noticed this type of problem before, so your machine usually
keeps good time, but right now it isn't.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2007-07-17 00:39:36 | Re: Clock skew with PG CVS repository? |
Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2007-07-13 06:03:30 | Re: [DOCS] Users comments don't migrate to docs for new version? |