| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: libpq error message refactoring |
| Date: | 2022-09-23 02:40:47 |
| Message-ID: | 2032898.1663900847@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> I suspect the appendPQExpBufferVA is orthogonal - most (all?) of the other
> functions in pqexpbuffer.h are visible, so it feels weird/confusing to not
> make appendPQExpBufferVA() available.
I thought the same to start with, but if I'm right in my nearby reply
that we'll have to make callers loop around appendPQExpBufferVA,
then it seems like a good idea to keep it closely held.
More than zero commentary about that would be a good thing, too.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2022-09-23 02:45:43 | Re: libpq error message refactoring |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2022-09-23 02:37:29 | Re: libpq error message refactoring |