| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Cleaning up historical portability baggage |
| Date: | 2022-08-12 22:45:27 |
| Message-ID: | 203254.1660344327@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I'm curious, though... if we used compiler builtins, would
> -march/-mcpu etc know about this kind of thing, for people who wanted
> to compile on ancient hardware, or, I guess more interestingly, newer
> tricks that we haven't got around to learning about yet?
No idea, but I could run some tests if you have something
specific in mind.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2022-08-12 23:04:12 | Re: Add lasterrno setting for dir_existsfile() |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2022-08-12 22:22:01 | Re: Add lasterrno setting for dir_existsfile() |