From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bill Cunningham <billc(at)ballydev(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-interfaces <pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers |
Date: | 2002-04-30 21:16:33 |
Message-ID: | 2032.1020201393@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-interfaces |
Bill Cunningham <billc(at)ballydev(dot)com> writes:
> So we now have a default schema name of the current user?
> ... This is exactly how DB2 operates, implict schemas for each user.
You can operate that way. It's not the default though; the DBA will
have to explicitly do a CREATE SCHEMA for each user. For instance:
test=# CREATE USER tgl;
CREATE USER
test=# CREATE SCHEMA tgl AUTHORIZATION tgl;
CREATE
test=# \c - tgl
You are now connected as new user tgl.
test=> select current_schemas();
current_schemas
-----------------
{tgl,public} -- my search path is now tgl, public
(1 row)
-- this creates tgl.foo:
test=> create table foo(f1 int);
CREATE
test=> select * from foo;
f1
----
(0 rows)
test=> select * from tgl.foo;
f1
----
(0 rows)
If you don't create schemas then you get backwards-compatible behavior
(all the users end up sharing the "public" schema as their current
schema).
See the development-docs pages I mentioned before for details.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-05-01 00:11:10 | the parsing of parameters |
Previous Message | Bill Cunningham | 2002-04-30 20:46:34 | Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Barwick | 2002-05-01 01:46:37 | Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers |
Previous Message | Bill Cunningham | 2002-04-30 20:46:34 | Re: Schemas: status report, call for developers |