From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Mathijs Brands <mathijs(at)ilse(dot)nl> |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Larry Rosenman <ler(at)lerctr(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-ports <pgsql-ports(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-Admin <pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
Date: | 2001-03-28 23:23:16 |
Message-ID: | 20299.985821796@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers pgsql-ports |
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 05:33:05PM -0500, Bruce Momjian allegedly wrote:
>> Sure 'ps -U' will work, but it was reported that on Solaris, plain ps
>> can't show the postgres status display, while ucb/ps can. I don't need
>> specific columns. What I need is the postgres status parameters, and if
>> possible, a user restriction to ps for performance reasons.
Looking at the sendmail code, it seems they use SPT_REUSEARGV (what we
call PS_USE_CLOBBER_ARGV) technique on Solaris. Possibly the problem is
simply that line 65 in src/backend/utils/misc/ps_status.c fails to
cover Solaris as one of the possible options:
#elif defined(__linux__) || defined(_AIX4) || defined(_AIX3) || defined(__sgi) || (defined(sun) && !defined(BSD)) || defined(ultrix) || defined(__ksr__) || defined(__osf__) || defined(__QNX__) || defined(__svr4__) || defined(__svr5__)
#define PS_USE_CLOBBER_ARGV
Can someone check whether adding an appropriate Solaris symbol (which
one?) fixes the problem?
The coding technique embodied in lines 63-67 pretty much sucks anyway,
since this platform-specific knowledge ought to be out in the port.h
files rather than hidden in the guts of the system. I don't want to
touch it right now, but I think we ought to have things like
#define PS_STATUS_TECHNIQUE PS_USE_CLOBBER_ARGV
in the port.h files, rather than these massive #ifdefs.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2001-03-28 23:36:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-28 23:07:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2001-03-28 23:36:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-28 23:07:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Larry Rosenman | 2001-03-28 23:36:30 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2001-03-28 23:07:46 | Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PORTS] pgmonitor and Solaris |