From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) |
Date: | 2005-12-05 05:25:33 |
Message-ID: | 20289.1133760333@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Done ... let me know whether the back branches still pass regression
>> for you ;-)
> I checked back to 7.3 and everything passed. I did a cvs update,
> configure, gmake, and regression run for each branch.
[ digs a bit deeper... ] Actually, it appears that that bug didn't
exist before 8.1; it was introduced here:
2005-03-16 22:18 momjian
* src/port/snprintf.c: Factor duplicate snprintf code into
functions.
by an ill-considered removal of an unsigned local variable.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jan Wieck | 2005-12-05 05:51:46 | Re: Selecting Large Object and TOAST |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-05 05:10:35 | Re: port/snprintf.c (was Re: Numeric 508 datatype) |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Brown | 2005-12-05 06:40:55 | Re: Reducing relation locking overhead |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-05 05:21:41 | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2005-12-05 07:02:30 | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-12-05 05:21:41 | Re: [PATCHES] snprintf() argument reordering not working |