From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Jonathan Daugherty <jdaugherty(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Bulk data insertion |
Date: | 2004-11-26 23:46:54 |
Message-ID: | 20283.1101512814@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Jonathan Daugherty <jdaugherty(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> The problem is that I don't want to spend a lot of time and memory
> building such a query (in C). I would like to know if there is a way to
> take this huge chunk of data and get it into the database in a less
> memory-intensive way. I suppose I could use COPY to put the data into a
> table with triggers that would do the checks on the data, but it seems
> inelegant and I'd like to know if there's a better way.
Actually I'd say that is the elegant way. SQL is fundamentally a
set-oriented (table-oriented) language, and forcing it to do things in
an array fashion is just misusing the tool.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Gary L.Burnore | 2004-11-26 23:49:03 | Re: comp.databases.postgresql.* groups and RFD |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-11-26 23:39:16 | Re: Regexp matching: bug or operator error? |