| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Japin Li <japinli(at)hotmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Keith Paskett <keith(dot)paskett(at)logansw(dot)com>, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: pg_restore error with partitioned table having exclude constraint |
| Date: | 2025-04-17 15:18:36 |
| Message-ID: | 202504171518.tpkk67i7pauh@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On 2025-Apr-17, Japin Li wrote:
> It seems PG 16 does not support exclusion constraints on partitioned tables.
Yeah, my recollection is that they were purposefully disallowed (mainly
because I didn't want to research how to fully make them work when
adding local partitioned indexes), and that we needed to do more work if
we wanted to let them through. I suspect commit 8c852ba9a4 was mistaken
to allow that case without looking for further implications.
--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"On the other flipper, one wrong move and we're Fatal Exceptions"
(T.U.X.: Term Unit X - http://www.thelinuxreview.com/TUX/)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Keith Paskett | 2025-04-17 19:03:04 | Re: pg_restore error with partitioned table having exclude constraint |
| Previous Message | Japin Li | 2025-04-17 14:54:16 | Re: pg_restore error with partitioned table having exclude constraint |