From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints |
Date: | 2025-03-12 09:50:13 |
Message-ID: | 202503120950.zbvdvdj5rh7b@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Mar-12, Ashutosh Bapat wrote:
> If the test passes for you, can you please try the patches at [1] on
> top of your patches? Please apply those, set and export environment
> variable PG_TEST_EXTRA=regress_dump_test, and run 002_pg_upgrade test?
> I intended to do this but can not do it since the test always fails
> with your patches applied.
Oh, I need to enable a PG_TEST_EXTRA option in order for the test to
run? FFS. That explains why the tests passed just fine for me.
I'll re-run.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"La conclusión que podemos sacar de esos estudios es que
no podemos sacar ninguna conclusión de ellos" (Tanenbaum)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amul Sul | 2025-03-12 10:02:07 | Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature |
Previous Message | Nisha Moond | 2025-03-12 09:45:48 | Re: Conflict detection for multiple_unique_conflicts in logical replication |