From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Support NOT VALID / VALIDATE constraint options for named NOT NULL constraints |
Date: | 2025-03-10 11:50:23 |
Message-ID: | 202503101150.dlnf4sfsqjd5@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Mar-10, Rushabh Lathia wrote:
> I adjusted the set_attnotnull() API and removed the added
> queue_validation parameter. Rather, the function start using wqueue
> input parameter as a check.
> If wqueue is NULL, skip the queue_validation. Attaching patch here,
> but not sure how clear it is, in term of understanding the API. Your
> thoughts/inputs?
Yeah, I think this makes sense, if it supports all the cases correctly.
(If in your code you have any calls of set_attnotnull that pass a NULL
wqueue during ALTER TABLE in order to avoid queueing a check, you had
better have comments to explain this.)
Kindly do not send patches standalone, because the CFbot doesn't
understand that it needs to apply it on top of the three previous
patches. You need to send all 4 patches every time. You can see the
result here:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/patch/5554/
If you click on the "need rebase!" label you'll see that it tried to
apply patch 0004 to the top of the master branch, and that obviously
failed. (FWIW if you click on the "summary" label you'll also see that
the patch has been failing the CI tests since Feb 27.)
> Looking further for AdjustNotNullInheritance() I don't see need of
> rename this API as it's just adding new error check now for an
> existing NOT NULL constraint.
OK.
> JFYI, I can reproduce the failure Ashutosh Bapat reported, while
> running the pg_upgrade test through meson commands. I am
> investigating that further.
Ah good, thanks.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Industry suffers from the managerial dogma that for the sake of stability
and continuity, the company should be independent of the competence of
individual employees." (E. Dijkstra)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2025-03-10 11:52:26 | Re: per backend WAL statistics |
Previous Message | David Rowley | 2025-03-10 11:45:35 | Re: Query ID Calculation Fix for DISTINCT / ORDER BY and LIMIT / OFFSET |