From: | Sutou Kouhei <kou(at)clear-code(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com |
Cc: | andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net, msawada(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-committers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Refactor COPY FROM to use format callback functions. |
Date: | 2025-02-28 22:16:41 |
Message-ID: | 20250301.071641.1257013931056303227.kou@clear-code.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers |
Hi,
Thanks for following up the patch!
In <CAD21AoBA414Q76LthY65NJfWbjOxXn1bdFFsD_NBhT2wPUS1SQ(at)mail(dot)gmail(dot)com>
"Re: pgsql: Refactor COPY FROM to use format callback functions." on Fri, 28 Feb 2025 12:56:19 -0800,
Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Right. I've attached the updated patch.
In general, this approach will work but could you keep
the same signature for backward compatibility?
> --- a/src/backend/commands/copyfromparse.c
> +++ b/src/backend/commands/copyfromparse.c
> +bool
> +NextCopyFromRawFields(CopyFromState cstate, char ***fields, int *nfields, bool is_csv)
> +{
> + return NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(cstate, fields, nfields, is_csv);
> +}
NextCopyFromRawFields() uses
NextCopyFromRawFields(CopyFromState cstate, char ***fields,
int *nfields) (no "bool is_csv") before we remove it. So
could you use the no "bool is_csv" signature for backward
compatibility?
bool
NextCopyFromRawFields(CopyFromState cstate, char ***fields, int *nfields)
{
return NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(cstate, fields, nfields, cstate->opts.csv_mode);
}
> @@ -738,6 +742,15 @@ CopyReadBinaryData(CopyFromState cstate, char *dest, int nbytes)
> /*
> * Read raw fields in the next line for COPY FROM in text or csv mode.
> * Return false if no more lines.
> + */
> +bool
> +NextCopyFromRawFields(CopyFromState cstate, char ***fields, int *nfields, bool is_csv)
> +{
> + return NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(cstate, fields, nfields, is_csv);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Workhorse for NextCopyFromRawFields().
It may be better that we don't split docs for
NextCopyFromRawFields() and
NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal(). How about referring the
NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal() doc from the
NextCopyFromRawFields() doc something like the following?
/*
* See NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal() for details.
*/
bool
NextCopyFromRawFields(...)
{
...
}
/*
* Workhorse for NextCopyFromRawFields().
*
* Read raw fields ...
*
* ...
*/
static pg_attribute_always_inline bool
NextCopyFromRawFieldsInternal()
{
...
}
Thanks,
--
kou
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-02-28 22:39:49 | Re: pgsql: Refactor COPY FROM to use format callback functions. |
Previous Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-02-28 22:06:19 | pgsql: Adjust auto_explain's GUC descriptions. |