From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Ranier Vilela <ranier(dot)vf(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Simplify the logic a bit (src/bin/scripts/reindexdb.c) |
Date: | 2025-02-27 19:50:22 |
Message-ID: | 202502271950.uzadrbkdkiax@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Feb-14, Ranier Vilela wrote:
> Attached is the prototype version v1.
> What do you think?
I think this is still a bit confused. The new function's comment says
"prepare the list of tables to ..." but what it really receives is a
list of _indexes_ (as evidenced by the fact that they're compared to
pg_index.indexrelid). So on input the user_list is an index list, and
on output it has been changed into a list of tables, and the list of
indexes is the function's return value? That seems quite weird. I
propose to change the API of this new function thus:
static void
get_parallel_tabidx_list(PGconn *conn,
SimpleStringList *index_list,
SimpleStringList *table_list,
bool echo);
where index_list is inout and the table_list is just an output argument.
I would also remove the 'type' argument, because I don't see a need to
keep it.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"After a quick R of TFM, all I can say is HOLY CR** THAT IS COOL! PostgreSQL was
amazing when I first started using it at 7.2, and I'm continually astounded by
learning new features and techniques made available by the continuing work of
the development team."
Berend Tober, http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2007-08/msg01009.php
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2025-02-27 19:52:40 | Re: SQLFunctionCache and generic plans |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-02-27 19:41:05 | Re: moving some code out of explain.c |