| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, Suraj Kharage <suraj(dot)kharage(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature |
| Date: | 2025-02-27 11:18:51 |
| Message-ID: | 202502271118.3jopzlc5yfkn@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Feb-27, Amul Sul wrote:
> Attached is the rebased patch set against the latest master head,
> which also includes a *new* refactoring patch (0001). In this patch,
> I’ve re-added ATExecAlterChildConstr(), which is required for the main
> feature patch (0008) to handle recursion from different places while
> altering enforceability.
I think you refer to ATExecAlterConstrEnforceability, which claims
(falsely) that it is a subroutine to ATExecAlterConstrRecurse; in
reality it is called from ATExecAlterConstraintInternal or at least
that's what I see in your 0008. So I wonder if you haven't confused
yourself here. If nothing else, that comments needs fixed. I didn't
review these patches.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Porque francamente, si para saber manejarse a uno mismo hubiera que
rendir examen... ¿Quién es el machito que tendría carnet?" (Mafalda)
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sadeq Dousti | 2025-02-27 11:44:46 | Re: psql \dh: List High-Level (Root) Tables and Indexes |
| Previous Message | newtglobal postgresql_contributors | 2025-02-27 11:09:49 | Re: New "raw" COPY format |