| From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Joel Jacobson <joel(at)compiler(dot)org>, Suraj Kharage <suraj(dot)kharage(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: NOT ENFORCED constraint feature |
| Date: | 2025-02-18 08:43:35 |
| Message-ID: | 202502180843.itbn7ad3eepn@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Feb-18, Amul Sul wrote:
> The patch looks quite reasonable, but I’m concerned that renaming
> ATExecAlterConstrRecurse() and ATExecAlterChildConstr() exclusively
> for deferrability might require the enforceability patch to duplicate
> these functions, even though some operations (e.g., pg_constraint
> updates and recursion on child constraints) could have been reused.
True. I'll give another look to your 0008 and Suraj's patch for
inheritability change, to avoid repetitive boilerplate as much as
possible.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jelte Fennema-Nio | 2025-02-18 08:51:12 | Re: Add new protocol message to change GUCs for usage with future protocol-only GUCs |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-02-18 08:40:37 | Re: Log a warning in pg_createsubscriber for max_slot_wal_keep_size |