| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Lukas Fittl <lukas(at)fittl(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Marko M <marko(at)pganalyze(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Optionally record Plan IDs to track plan changes for a query |
| Date: | 2025-02-13 11:25:25 |
| Message-ID: | 202502131125.3kk6id4tcrtv@alvherre.pgsql |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Feb-12, Sami Imseih wrote:
> Greg S. Mullane wrote:
>
> > I agree fingerprint is the right final word. But "jumble" conveys
> > the *process* better than "fingerprinting". I view it as jumbling
> > produces an object that can be fingerprinted.
>
> hmm, "jumble" describes something that is scrambled
> or not in order, such as the 64-bit hash produced. It
> sounds like the final product.
I don't understand why we would change any naming here at all. I think
you should be looking at a much broader consensus and plus-ones that a
renaming is needed. -1 from me.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"No renuncies a nada. No te aferres a nada."
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Mahendra Singh Thalor | 2025-02-13 11:25:56 | Re: Non-text mode for pg_dumpall |
| Previous Message | Ranier Vilela | 2025-02-13 11:16:47 | Re: Small memory fixes for pg_createsubcriber |