Re: Fix for Extra Parenthesis in pgbench progress message

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us
Cc: nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com, andres(at)anarazel(dot)de, masao(dot)fujii(at)oss(dot)nttdata(dot)com, ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-release(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Fix for Extra Parenthesis in pgbench progress message
Date: 2025-02-07 23:26:44
Message-ID: 20250208.082644.785394582119627588.ishii@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 01:10:04PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> My thought was that duplicating the logic isn't so bad, as attached.
>
>> WFM!
>
> It does fix the problem here, so I'll make it so.

Sorry for the problem and thank you for the fix!
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS K.K.
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tomas Vondra 2025-02-07 23:29:11 Re: should we have a fast-path planning for OLTP starjoins?
Previous Message Melanie Plageman 2025-02-07 23:15:58 Re: pgbench with partitioned tables