From: | Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jacob Brazeal <jacob(dot)brazeal(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Commitfest app release on Feb 17 with many improvements |
Date: | 2025-02-05 08:46:30 |
Message-ID: | 202502050846.o5agxnt3cyoo@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Feb-04, Jelte Fennema-Nio wrote:
> To be clear: the only stats column currently in the staging
> environment shows exactly this. Changes 4 and 5 are *not* visible in
> columns on the commitfest page, that info is currently only visible on
> the patch details page. (For context for others: during the FOSDEM
> meeting 4 was a column on the commitfest page, but I reverted that
> after the feedback there)
>
> So, I guess clutter wise the current staging is acceptable to you.
Check.
> On Tue, 4 Feb 2025 at 17:27, Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> wrote:
> > 2. a per-patch breakdown of the number of addition and deletions for the
> > last patchset version posted, one line per patch. This would appear
> > in a tooltip on the column for the totals, to avoid interface
> > clutter.
>
> Statistics for each patch would definitely be nice. Not trivial to add
> though, because it would need cfbot to get those statistics for each
> patch. I created a github issue for this idea to track it[1]
Understood, thanks.
> > > 10. Allow sorting patches by total additions/deletions (added together
> > > for total lines changed)
> >
> > Seems reasonable, though I don't see much of an use-case for this.
>
> My main idea behind this is to allow people to easily find some small
> patchsets, for when they have ~30 minutes to review something. Or for
> new contributors to find something to review without getting
> overwhelmed.
Ah, okay, sounds good.
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Amit Kapila | 2025-02-05 09:12:31 | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Previous Message | Álvaro Herrera | 2025-02-05 08:44:40 | Re: Restrict publishing of partitioned table with a foreign table as partition |