From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Consolidate docs for vacuum-related GUCs in new subsection |
Date: | 2025-01-13 20:46:40 |
Message-ID: | 202501132046.m4mcvxxswznu@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On 2025-Jan-13, Melanie Plageman wrote:
> Since I didn't hear back about this and I don't see an obvious
> alternative reorganization in guc_tables.c, I plan to just push the
> attached patch that updates only postgresql.conf.sample.
Apologies, I was very unclear -- I didn't want to talk about the
ordering of entries in the code, but the categorization. See the
config_group_names list in guc_tables.c, which defines some groups.
Each setting belongs into a group, and those groups correspond to what
the sample config file lists as section/subsection titles and to the
grouping in the docs. Also, this categorization affects how the entries
are listed in the pg_settings view and in "postgres --describe-config",
which feed from the same tables.
Perhaps with your changes (assuming I read your commit message right),
we need new groups:
VACUUMING
VACUUMING_FREEZING
VACUUMING_AUTOVACUUM
Thanks
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Doing what he did amounts to sticking his fingers under the hood of the
implementation; if he gets his fingers burnt, it's his problem." (Tom Lane)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2025-01-13 22:19:11 | pgsql: Revert "TupleHashTable: store additional data along with tuple." |
Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2025-01-13 20:22:11 | pgsql: Reorder vacuum GUCs in postgresql.conf.sample to match docs |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Treat | 2025-01-13 21:22:09 | Re: Question about behavior of deletes with REPLICA IDENTITY NOTHING |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2025-01-13 20:43:46 | Re: AIO v2.2 |