Re: Postgres 17 domains with NOT NULL and pg_get_constraintdef()

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: shammat(at)gmx(dot)net
Cc: pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres 17 domains with NOT NULL and pg_get_constraintdef()
Date: 2025-01-08 13:10:45
Message-ID: 202501081310.k4vpnx4wa623@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On 2025-Jan-08, shammat(at)gmx(dot)net wrote:

Hello,

> However, because the domain is defined with NOT NULL, this fails with
>
> > ERROR: invalid constraint type "n"
>
> with 17.2 on Windows and Linux.
>
> This is a result of storing the NOT NULL constraint in pg_constraint
> and can easily be avoided by either using contype <> 'n' or by not calling
> pg_get_constraintdef if contype = 'n'

Yeah, thanks for the report -- this is clearly a bug and it was fixed
already in the 17 branch, but it's not been released yet. It'll be in
the February release.

Author: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Branch: master [09d09d429] 2024-11-27 13:50:27 +0100
Branch: REL_17_STABLE [6e793582b] 2024-11-27 13:50:27 +0100

Fix pg_get_constraintdef for NOT NULL constraints on domains

We added pg_constraint rows for all not-null constraints, first for
tables and later for domains; but while the ones for tables were
reverted, the ones for domains were not. However, we did accidentally
revert ruleutils.c support for the ones on domains in 6f8bb7c1e961,
which breaks running pg_get_constraintdef() on them. Put that back.

This is only needed in branch 17, because we've reinstated this code in
branch master with commit 14e87ffa5c54. Add some new tests in both
branches.

I couldn't find anything else that needs de-reverting.

Reported-by: Erki Eessaar <erki(dot)eessaar(at)taltech(dot)ee>
Reviewed-by: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/AS8PR01MB75110350415AAB8BBABBA1ECFE222@AS8PR01MB7511.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Right now the sectors on the hard disk run clockwise, but I heard a rumor that
you can squeeze 0.2% more throughput by running them counterclockwise.
It's worth the effort. Recommended." (Gerry Pourwelle)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-01-08 17:01:36 Re: Unexpected results from a query with UNION ALL
Previous Message shammat 2025-01-08 11:15:19 Postgres 17 domains with NOT NULL and pg_get_constraintdef()