From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Something fishy about the current Makefiles |
Date: | 2011-01-06 18:53:48 |
Message-ID: | 20248.1294340028@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Whilst fooling around with GIN, I have repeatedly observed that doing
>> "make" in src/backend/access/gin, followed by "make install-bin" in
>> src/backend, fails to rebuild the postgres executable --- it just
>> installs the existing one. A second execution of "make install-bin"
>> does notice that postgres is out of date and rebuilds it. This
>> procedure for rebuilding after changing one or two .c files has always
>> worked for me before. I can't avoid the suspicion that the recent
>> changes to make things more parallel-friendly broke something.
> I've noticed something like this as well, but haven't been able to
> figure out exactly what is going wrong.
I'm not entirely sure either, but it looks like the first upper "make"
updates the objfiles.txt file in src/backend/access and then the second
one realizes it has to rebuild postgres. Something about multi-level
dependencies isn't quite right.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-01-06 18:56:22 | Re: Problem with pg_upgrade (8.4 -> 9.0) due to ALTER DATABASE SET ROLE |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-01-06 17:35:08 | Re: WIP: Range Types |