Re: Drop back the redundant "Lock" suffix from LWLock wait event names

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Bertrand Drouvot <bertranddrouvot(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, christophe(dot)courtois(at)dalibo(dot)com
Subject: Re: Drop back the redundant "Lock" suffix from LWLock wait event names
Date: 2024-12-03 15:01:41
Message-ID: 202412031501.jdizwzhqiev7@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-Dec-02, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> Oh, you're right, this was unintentional and unnoticed. I'll push this
> shortly, to both 17 and master.

Pushed, thanks Christophe and Bertrand.

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
<Schwern> It does it in a really, really complicated way
<crab> why does it need to be complicated?
<Schwern> Because it's MakeMaker.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kirill Reshke 2024-12-03 15:04:08 Re: Amcheck verification of GiST and GIN
Previous Message Matthias van de Meent 2024-12-03 15:01:39 Re: Showing primitive index scan count in EXPLAIN ANALYZE (for skip scan and SAOP scans)