From: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Generating configure from configure.ac |
Date: | 2024-11-26 05:24:13 |
Message-ID: | 20241126052413.36.nmisch@google.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 12:07:59AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> It seems plausible to me that the -D_LARGE_FILES=1 settings in our
> AIX animals' configuration are carried over from some dim past where
> we didn't have this configure test, or it was implemented even less
> correctly than now. I wonder whether Noah has any records of their
> origin.
It's tied to Python defining _LARGE_FILES when PostgreSQL doesn't. More info:
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/20180531224129.GB3343825%40rfd.leadboat.com
I have some other notes on the topic, but that thread has the major points.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Richard Guo | 2024-11-26 05:56:53 | Re: Reordering DISTINCT keys to match input path's pathkeys |
Previous Message | Bertrand Drouvot | 2024-11-26 05:16:05 | Re: Potential ABI breakage in upcoming minor releases |