Re: proposal: schema variables

From: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, DUVAL REMI <REMI(dot)DUVAL(at)cheops(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: schema variables
Date: 2024-11-20 20:13:13
Message-ID: 20241120201313.t4wbhld4ktgielaf@erthalion.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance

> On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 08:14:01PM +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
> I wrote POC of VARIABLE(varname) syntax support

Thanks, the results look good. I'm still opposed the idea of having a
warning, and think it has to be an error -- but it's my subjective
opinion. Lets see if there are more votes on that topic.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mikhail Gribkov 2024-11-20 20:35:09 Accessing other session's temp table
Previous Message Dmitry Dolgov 2024-11-20 20:11:00 Re: ALTER TABLE uses a bistate but not for toast tables

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Mullineux 2024-11-20 22:11:09 Re: Has gen_random_uuid() gotten much slower in v17?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-11-20 15:46:06 Re: Has gen_random_uuid() gotten much slower in v17?