From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Shlok Kyal <shlok(dot)kyal(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Disallow UPDATE/DELETE on table with unpublished generated column as REPLICA IDENTITY |
Date: | 2024-11-08 11:47:41 |
Message-ID: | 202411081147.ofdaekfjd24a@alvherre.pgsql |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2024-Nov-07, Amit Kapila wrote:
> BTW, I was thinking as to how to fix it on back branches and it seems
> we should restrict to define REPLICA IDENTITY on stored generated
> columns in the first place in back branches as those can't be
> replicated. So, the following should fail:
>
> CREATE TABLE testpub_gencol (a INT, b INT GENERATED ALWAYS AS (a + 1)
> STORED NOT NULL);
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX testpub_gencol_idx ON testpub_gencol (b);
> ALTER TABLE testpub_gencol REPLICA IDENTITY USING index testpub_gencol_idx;
>
> Peter, do you have an opinion on this?
I think a blanket restriction of this sort is not a good idea (at least
in back branches), because there might be people using replica
identities with stacks other than pgoutput. Would it work to enforce
the restriction when such a table is added to a publication?
--
Álvaro Herrera 48°01'N 7°57'E — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"Nunca confiaré en un traidor. Ni siquiera si el traidor lo he creado yo"
(Barón Vladimir Harkonnen)
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kirill Reshke | 2024-11-08 12:21:46 | Re: Page freezing, FSM, and WAL replay |
Previous Message | Dilip Kumar | 2024-11-08 11:35:23 | Re: Fix small typo, use InvalidRelFileNumber instead of InvalidOid |