Re: BUG #18614: [ECPG] out of bound in DecodeDateTime

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Павел Некрасов <p(dot)nekrasov(at)fobos-nt(dot)ru>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, pgsql-bugs <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #18614: [ECPG] out of bound in DecodeDateTime
Date: 2024-10-26 14:14:53
Message-ID: 202410261414.faj4u26ja6wm@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

On 2024-Oct-25, Павел Некрасов wrote:

> Thank you for the clarification!
>
> Would it be possible to know which specific organizations or projects
> actively use ecpg?

It doesn't seem realistic to maintain a complete list, and many
organizations are just not going to tell us or anyone that they're using
it.

--
Álvaro Herrera PostgreSQL Developer — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"This is a foot just waiting to be shot" (Andrew Dunstan)

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message BRAD BLANSKI 2024-10-26 16:34:41 Installation Error: Column d.Dtaiculocale dose not exist Line 8
Previous Message PG Bug reporting form 2024-10-26 06:00:00 BUG #18674: Partitioned table doesn't depend on access method it uses