| From: | "Peter J(dot) Holzer" <hjp-pgsql(at)hjp(dot)at> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: glibc updarte 2.31 to 2.38 |
| Date: | 2024-09-19 17:43:49 |
| Message-ID: | 20240919174349.grrz4w25jmxfk77a@hjp.at |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On 2024-09-19 16:37:41 +0200, Paul Foerster wrote:
> we have SLES 15.5 which has glibc 2.31. Our admin told us that he's
> about to install the SLES 15.6 update which contains glibc 2.38.
>
> I have built our PostgreSQL software from source on SLES 15.5, because
> we have some special requirements which the packages cannot fulfill.
> So I have questions:
>
> 1) Do I have to build it again on 15.6?
>
> 2) Does the glibc update have any impact? I recall having to have
> everything reindexed when the 2.28 update came due to major locale
> changes, but I didn't have to do it since then.
>
> 3) Where and how can I find out if it is necessary to reindex?
I wrote a small script[1] which prints all unicode code points and a few
selected[2] longer strings in order. If you run that before and after
the upgrade and the output doesn't change, you are probably be fine.
(It checks only the default collation, though: If you have indexes using
a different collation you would have to modify the script accordingly.)
If there are differences, closer inspection might show that the changes
don't affect you. But I would reindex all indexes on text (etc.) columns
just to be sure.
hp
[1] https://git.hjp.at:3000/hjp/pgcollate
[2] The selection is highly subjective and totally unscientific.
Additions are welcome.
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Story must make more sense than reality.
|_|_) | |
| | | hjp(at)hjp(dot)at | -- Charles Stross, "Creative writing
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | challenge!"
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Paul Foerster | 2024-09-19 17:51:52 | Re: glibc updarte 2.31 to 2.38 |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2024-09-19 17:12:11 | Re: glibc updarte 2.31 to 2.38 |