On 2024-Aug-07, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> I think this schema is nuts. Do you have a practical use for something
> like this?
FWIW if you try to set this up the other way around, you get a different
error:
create table t (a int primary key) partition by list (a);
create table t1 partition of t for values in (1);
alter table t add foreign key (a) references t1;
ERROR: cannot ALTER TABLE "t1" because it is being used by active queries in this session
so I'm not bothered by the restriction in functionality.
--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/