| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru>, vignesh C <vignesh21(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Evaluate arguments of correlated SubPlans in the referencing ExprState |
| Date: | 2024-08-01 03:24:12 |
| Message-ID: | 20240801032412.2jfqiim5zfgzsnaa@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2024-07-19 21:17:12 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2024-07-18 16:01:19 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Alena Rybakina <lena(dot)ribackina(at)yandex(dot)ru> writes:
> > > I fixed it. The code remains the same.
> >
> > I see the cfbot is again complaining that this patch doesn't apply.
> >
> > In hopes of pushing this over the finish line, I fixed up the (minor)
> > patch conflict and also addressed the cosmetic complaints I had
> > upthread [1]. I think the attached v4 is committable. If Andres is
> > too busy, I can push it, but really it's his patch ...
>
> Thanks for the rebase - I'll try to get it pushed in the next few days!
And finally done. No code changes. I did spend some more time evaluating the
resource usage benefits actually do exist (see mail upthread).
Thanks for the reviews, rebasing and the reminders!
Greetings,
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) | 2024-08-01 03:39:56 | RE: Conflict detection and logging in logical replication |
| Previous Message | Alexander Lakhin | 2024-08-01 03:00:00 | v17 vs v16 performance comparison |