Re: Protocol question regarding Portal vs Cursor

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: davecramer(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Protocol question regarding Portal vs Cursor
Date: 2024-07-27 23:06:00
Message-ID: 20240728.080600.2024116874840005196.ishii@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Yes, sorry, I should have said one can not create a with hold portal using
> the BIND command

Ok.

It would be possible to add a new parameter to the BIND command to
create such a portal. But it needs some changes to the existing
protocol definition and requires protocol version up, which is a major
pain.

Best reagards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS LLC
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en/
Japanese:http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joseph Koshakow 2024-07-27 23:06:30 Re: Fix overflow in pg_size_pretty
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-07-27 22:48:47 Re: why is pg_upgrade's regression run so slow?