Re: [Buildfarm:63] Re: Why is citext/regress failing on hamerkop?

Hello,

I'm a hamerkop maintainer.
Sorry I have missed the scm error for so long.

Today I switched scmrepo from git.postgresql.org/git/postgresql.git
to github.com/postgres/postgres.git and successfully modernized
the build target code.

with best regards, Haruka Takatsuka

On Thu, 16 May 2024 16:18:23 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > For citext_utf8, I pushed cff4e5a3. Hamerkop runs infrequently, so
> > here's hoping for 100% green on master by Tuesday or so.
>
> Meanwhile, back at the ranch, it doesn't seem that changed anything:
>
> https://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=hamerkop&dt=2024-05-16%2011%3A00%3A32
>
> ... and now that I look more closely, the reason why it didn't
> change anything is that hamerkop is still building 0294df2
> on HEAD. All its other branches are equally stuck at the
> end of March. So this is a flat-out-broken animal, and I
> plan to just ignore it until its owner un-sticks it.
> (In particular, I think we shouldn't be in a hurry to push
> the patch discussed downthread.)
>
> Andrew: maybe the buildfarm server could be made to flag
> animals building exceedingly old commits? This is the second
> problem of this sort that I've noticed this month, and you
> really have to look closely to realize it's happening.
>
> regards, tom lane

_____________________________________________________________________