| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bowen Shi <zxwsbg12138(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae |
| Date: | 2024-05-16 16:38:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20240516163810.t3oom62dxxmth7cg@awork3.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi,
On 2024-05-16 15:31:20 +0800, Bowen Shi wrote:
> Yes, I have preserved the coredump file of vacuum and several other related
> processes. It has been at least 10 minutes stuck in the retry loop since I
> dumped this core file.
Could you print out *vacrel?
I'm wondering if there was index processing, due to the number of tuples. And
if so, what type of indexes. There'd need to be something that could lead to
new snapshots being acquired...
Greetings,
Andres Freund
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-05-16 16:47:21 | Re: BUG #18467: postgres_fdw (deparser) ignores LimitOption |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-05-16 16:34:50 | Re: differences between <> and != when using signed values on the right hand side |