From: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | add --no-sync to pg_upgrade's calls to pg_dump and pg_dumpall |
Date: | 2024-05-03 17:13:48 |
Message-ID: | 20240503171348.GA1731524@nathanxps13 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
This is likely small potatoes compared to some of the other
pg_upgrade-related improvements I've proposed [0] [1] or plan to propose,
but this is easy enough, and I already wrote the patch, so here it is.
AFAICT there's no reason to bother syncing these dump files to disk. If
someone pulls the plug during pg_upgrade, it's not like you can resume
pg_upgrade from where it left off. Also, I think we skipped syncing before
v10, anyway, as the --no-sync flag was only added in commit 96a7128, which
added the code to sync dump files, too.
[0] https://postgr.es/m/20240418041712.GA3441570%40nathanxps13
[1] https://postgr.es/m/20240503025140.GA1227404%40nathanxps13
--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v1-0001-add-no-sync-to-pg_upgrade-s-calls-to-pg_dump-all.patch | text/x-diff | 1.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Phil Eaton | 2024-05-03 17:35:31 | Re: Add minimal C example and SQL registration example for custom table access methods. |
Previous Message | David G. Johnston | 2024-05-03 16:00:12 | Re: Document NULL |