Re: pg_sequence_last_value() for unlogged sequences on standbys

From: Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pg_sequence_last_value() for unlogged sequences on standbys
Date: 2024-05-01 02:05:31
Message-ID: 20240501020531.GA721953@nathanxps13
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 08:13:17PM -0500, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> Good point. I'll work on a patch along these lines, then.

This ended up being easier than I expected. While unlogged sequences are
only supported on v15 and above, temporary sequences have been around since
v7.2, so this will probably need to be back-patched to all supported
versions. The added test case won't work for v12-v14 since it uses an
unlogged sequence. I'm not sure it's worth constructing a test case for
temporary sequences.

--
Nathan Bossart
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com

Attachment Content-Type Size
v1-0001-Fix-pg_sequence_last_value-for-non-permanent-sequ.patch text/x-diff 2.5 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Noah Misch 2024-05-01 02:24:12 Re: [PATCH] Improve amcheck to also check UNIQUE constraint in btree index.
Previous Message Nathan Bossart 2024-05-01 01:13:17 Re: pg_sequence_last_value() for unlogged sequences on standbys