Re: AIX support

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Sriram RK <sriram(dot)rk(at)outlook(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "tvk1271(at)gmail(dot)com" <tvk1271(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
Subject: Re: AIX support
Date: 2024-04-25 08:16:34
Message-ID: 202404250816.hbzvnut7p3jc@alvherre.pgsql
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2024-Apr-24, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I agree that targeting PG 18 for a new-er AIX port is the reasonable
> approach. If there is huge demand, someone can create an AIX fork for
> PG 17 using the reverted patches --- yeah, lots of pain there, but we
> have carried the AIX pain for too long with too little support.

I'm not sure how large the demand would be for an AIX port specifically
of 17, though. I mean, people using older versions can continue to use
16 until 18 is released. Upgrading past one major version is hardly
unheard of.

--
Álvaro Herrera Breisgau, Deutschland — https://www.EnterpriseDB.com/
"If you want to have good ideas, you must have many ideas. Most of them
will be wrong, and what you have to learn is which ones to throw away."
(Linus Pauling)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-04-25 08:17:00 Re: Remove unnecessary code rom be_lo_put()
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2024-04-25 08:03:11 Re: AIX support