Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?
Date: 2024-04-15 23:20:43
Message-ID: 20240415232043.hq6wfkepgneksmpj@awork3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On 2024-04-15 19:14:22 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> I think the right answer is to
> back-patch Michael's 65c5864d7 (xml2: Replace deprecated routines with
> recommended ones). We speculated about that at the time (see e.g.,
> 400928b83) but didn't pull the trigger. I think 65c5864d7 has now
> baked long enough that it'd be safe to back-patch.

Looks like a reasonable plan to me.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2024-04-15 23:30:46 Re: Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-04-15 23:14:22 Time to back-patch libxml deprecation fixes?